Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:19

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
A new COVID variant is spreading across California. Could we see a summer surge? - Sacramento Bee
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why are the democrats keep insisting that there are more than two genders?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Bank of America predicts major housing market changes are coming soon - TheStreet
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How was your JEE 2024 result like?
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why does a straight man like anal penetration?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Rod Stewart at Glastonbury: Old school charm from another era - BBC
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Fastest Payout Online Casinos 2025: Black Lotus Expands Customer Payment Options - GlobeNewswire
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
I Used to Dread Taking Creatine—Then I Found These Gummies - The Daily Beast